| |
| |
 |
|
Janet Napolitano wearing her "colors"
of
a Minute Man outfit
expose Napolitano's true nature.
Napolitano has always chosen the
politically expedient
path to advance her career track.
In Arizona her ever increasing hardness was to win support from Arizona's
conservative mainstream.
Today, Napolitano's attitudes toward immigration mirror President Obama's. If
Napolitano ever returns to Arizona, there is no doubt Napolitano would once
again put on the cloak of Republican conservatism.
Hispanic News believes Napolitano
should stay in Washington and never return to Arizona. |
|
|
Politically Expedient Napolitano Now
to Embark on Immigration Reform!
PHOENIX (By
Jon
Garrido, The Jon Garrido Network
and
Jeffrey Kaye,
LAT)
November November 30, 2008 —
With the passage of health care reform,
Republicans will be looking for a
scapegoat and as always, America's
Hispanics are a convenient target.
For the moment, Lou Dobbs may be gone
but Lou Dobbs wannabes
—
Republicans
—
can still be found in Washington.
Republicans therefore will mobilize a
crusade to fight approval of
immigration reform. Not because
immigration reform is wrong but rather
because Republicans need a congressional
victory to over come total defeat in the
2010 elections and if there is one topic
that embodies America's conservative
wrath
that will bring out the most vitriolic
crusaders, it is to win a battle against
America's punching bag
— Hispanics and immigration reform.
If any one person embodies the
vitriolic
politics of immigration reform, it is
Homeland Security Secretary Janet
Napolitano. As governor of Arizona in
2007, she signed one of the nation's
toughest state immigration laws, the
Legal Arizona Workers Act, which imposed
harsh penalties on businesses that
knowingly employed illegal workers. Now,
as the nation's top immigration
official, she will be asked to weigh in
on a lawsuit challenging the
constitutionality of that law. The case
comes before the U.S. Supreme Court as
Washington once again revives efforts to
overhaul the nation's immigration laws.
At the time she signed the Arizona bill,
Napolitano, citing the failure of
congressional leaders to take action,
insisted "states like Arizona have no
choice but to take strong action to
discourage the flow of illegal
immigration." Under the law, businesses
that willfully hire illegal immigrants
can be shut down temporarily or, for a
second offense, completely — a "business
death penalty," as Napolitano called it.
"Arizona has taken the most aggressive
action in the country against employers
who knowingly or intentionally hire
illegal workers," she wrote. The measure
was one of hundreds of immigration laws
passed across the country, largely as a
reaction to the stalemate over the issue
in Washington.
The Arizona statute came under immediate
attack from disparate groups rarely
found on the same side of the table.
Legal briefs opposing the law were filed
by farmers, contractors and the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce, as well as the
American Civil Liberties Union and the
Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund. The opponents' key
legal argument has been immigration
policy should be set by the federal
government, not by state and local
jurisdictions.
Now that she's exchanged her state hat
for a federal one, it will not be
surprising if Napolitano opposes the
measure she made law. As a governor who
grappled politically and fiscally with
the consequences of a massive influx of
illegal immigrants, she asserted the
authority of her state. But that was
then. Now, as the Obama administration's
point person on the issue, Napolitano is
likely to reflect the position her boss
took as a candidate, supporting
"comprehensive immigration reform so
local communities do not continue to
take matters into their own hands."
Napolitano has always chosen the
politically expedient
path to advance her career track. In
Arizona her ever increasing hardness was
to win support from Arizona's
conservative mainstream. Today,
Napolitano's
attitudes toward immigration mirror
President Obama's.
If Napolitano ever returns to Arizona,
there is no doubt Napolitano would once
again put on the cloak of Republican
conservatism.
First elected governor in 2002 with
support from the Hispanic electorate,
she opposed a 2004 Arizona ballot
measure that sought to bar illegal
immigrants from receiving some public
social services. The following year,
voicing skepticism about the
effectiveness of Bush administration
plans to improve fences at the border,
she famously proclaimed, "You show me a
50-foot wall, and I'll show you a
51-foot ladder." However, since becoming
chief of the Homeland Security
Department, the agency responsible for
the border fence, she has promised to
complete the unfinished portions and has
stepped up immigration audits of
employers.
Similarly, as officials from
Napolitano's agency and the White House
work with bipartisan congressional staff
to prepare immigration bills that most
likely will be introduced in December
and January, the consistent theme has
been toughness. Sen. Charles E. Schumer
(D-N.Y.), who as chairman of the
Senate's immigration subcommittee will
take a lead role in drafting
legislation, has said a bipartisan
immigration bill is doomed "if my
colleagues on the other side of the
aisle do not believe Democrats are
serious about enforcement." Schumer even
denounced use of the term "undocumented
workers," suggesting it conveys
legitimacy and signals the government
"is not serious about combating illegal
immigration."
In a speech this month laying out the
need for reform, Napolitano emphasized a
"three-legged stool" approach —
regulating the flow of immigrants,
dealing with those who are already here,
but beginning, she said, with "fair,
reliable enforcement."
Immigration reform advocates trying to
build momentum to produce a new law
point to favorable poll results on
immigration and a desire by both parties
to be responsive to Hispanic voters. But
proponents will face stiff obstacles,
particularly if a bill includes
provisions for what business lobbyists
call "future flow" — allowing employers
to bring in foreign workers. Unions
worry without safeguards, imported labor
will displace American workers.
The larger stumbling block will be the
"tough and fair pathway to earned legal
status," as Napolitano put it. It was
the legalization aspect of her speech
that garnered most news media attention,
even though it basically restated
President Obama's campaign pledge to
bring "the millions of illegal
immigrants in this country out of the
shadows . . . by meeting a number of
requirements — including registering,
paying a fine, passing a criminal
background check, fully paying all taxes
and learning English."
History shows anti-immigrant sentiment
is generally highest during economic
downturns, and groups favoring
immigration restrictions, such as the
Federation for American Immigration
Reform, or FAIR, are already citing high
U.S. unemployment as a reason to oppose
immigration bills. FAIR is joining with
the "tea party" crowd that emerged
during the healthcare debate, a loud and
angry coalition that will be unswayed by
the efforts of Napolitano, the Obama
administration and their congressional
allies to decorate immigration reform
packages with law-and-order ribbons.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|