Marco Rubio's Two Different Family Stories
WASHINGTON & SANTA
FE,
NM (By
Manuel Roig-Franzia,
Washington Post)
October 23, 2011 ―
During his rise to
political
prominence, Sen.
Marco Rubio
frequently repeated
a compelling version
of his family’s
history that had
special resonance in
South Florida. He
was the “son of
exiles,” he told
audiences, Cuban
Americans forced off
their beloved island
after “a thug,”
Fidel Castro, took
power.
But a review of
documents —
including
naturalization
papers and other
official records
— reveals that
the Florida
Republican’s
account
embellishes the
facts. The
documents show
that Rubio’s
parents came to
the United
States and were
admitted for
permanent
residence more
than
two-and-a-half
years before
Castro’s forces
overthrew the
Cuban government
and took power
on New Year’s
Day 1959. The supposed
flight of
Rubio’s parents
has been at the
core of the
young senator’s
political
identity, both
before and after
his stunning
tea-party-propelled
victory in last
year’s Senate
election. Rubio
— now considered
a prospective
2012 Republican
vice
presidential
candidate and a
possible future
presidential
contender —
mentions his
parents in the
second sentence
of the official
biography on his
Senate Web site.
It says that
Mario and
Oriales Rubio
“came to America
following Fidel
Castro’s
takeover.” And
the 40-year-old
senator with the
boyish smile and
prom-king good
looks has drawn
on the power of
that claim to
entrance
audiences
captivated by
the rhetorical
skills of one of
the more dynamic
stump speakers
in modern
American
politics. The real
story of his
parents’
migration
appears to be a
more
conventional
immigrant
narrative, a
couple who came
to the United
States seeking a
better life. In
the year they
arrived in
Florida, the
future Marxist
dictator was in
Mexico plotting
a quixotic
return to Cuba. Rubio’s
office confirmed
Thursday that
his parents
arrived in the
United States in
1956 but noted
that “while they
were prepared to
live here
permanently,
they always held
out the hope and
the option of
returning to
Cuba if things
improved.” They
returned to Cuba
several times
after Castro
came to power to
“assess the
situation with
the hope of
eventually
moving back,”
the office said
in a statement.
In a brief
interview
Thursday, Rubio
said his
accounts have
been based on
family lore.
“I’m going off
the oral history
of my family,”
he said. “All of
these documents
and passports
are not things
that I carried
around with me.” He said of
his parents:
“They were from
Cuba. They
wanted to live
in Cuba again.
They tried to
live in Cuba
again, and the
reality of what
it was made that
impossible.” In 2006, on
the eve of his
rise to speaker
of the Florida
House, Rubio
told an audience
that “in January
of 1959, a thug
named Fidel
Castro took
power in Cuba
and countless
Cubans were
forced to flee
and come here,
many — most —
here to America.
When they
arrived, they
were welcomed by
the most
compassionate
people on all
the Earth.” Wearing a red
flower in his
lapel, his voice
sometimes
emotional, he
praised those
who fled,
calling them “a
great
generation.” But
he also assured
them: “Today
your children
and
grandchildren
are the
secretary of
commerce of the
United States
and multiple
members of
Congress, they
are the CEO of
Fortune 500
companies and
successful
entrepreneurs,
they are
Grammy-winning
artists and they
are renowned
journalists,
they are a
United States
senator and
soon, even
speaker of the
Florida House.” The speech
drew heavy
coverage in
Florida, as it
was a momentous
event. Rubio was
the first Cuban
American to
become speaker
of the Florida
House. In
Florida, being
connected to the
post-revolution
exile community
gives a
politician
cachet that
could never be
achieved by
someone
identified with
the pre-Castro
exodus, a group
sometimes viewed
with suspicion.
When Rubio’s
parents left the
island, Cuban
migration to the
United States
was a trickle
compared with
what it would
become in the
years after
Castro’s
victory. “The
vast majority of
people who
emigrated in the
’50s went for
economic
reasons, not for
political
reasons,” said
Maria Cristina
Garcia, an
expert on Cuban
migration at
Cornell
University. Multiple
documents signed
by Rubio’s
parents,
including their
petitions for
naturalization,
show that Mario
and Oriales
Rubio arrived in
the United
States on May
27, 1956, with
their son Mario,
6. Maternal
grandfather
Pedro Victor
Garcia also came
to the United
States around
the same time.
Marco Rubio
has said that
his father left
Cuba after
enduring
hardships,
including the
loss of his
mother when he
was young. Rubio has
described the
death in moving
terms, although
details have
changed in his
accounts. In
February 2010,
during Rubio’s
electric speech
to the
Conservative
Political Action
Conference in
Washington, he
said that his
grandmother died
when his father
was 6 and that
“the day after
her funeral, he
went to work
selling coffee
in the streets
of Havana.”
Seven months
later, when his
father died in
the midst of
Rubio’s Senate
campaign, Rubio
wrote in an open
letter that his
father lost his
mother when he
was “just days
shy of his ninth
birthday.” The Social
Security numbers
for Rubio’s
father and
grandfather
suggest that
Mario Rubio
received his
Social Security
number in
Florida in 1956
and that Garcia
received his in
New York in
1956-57. What’s known
of their lives
in the United
States comes
primarily from
Marco Rubio’s
speeches and
writings. He
talks and writes
lovingly of his
father, telling
of the family’s
regular Sunday
trips to the
International
House of
Pancakes and how
his father
managed
equipment for
his Pop Warner
football team.
His father was a
bartender and
school crossing
guard; his
mother worked as
a hotel maid and
stocking shelves
at Kmart. The
family was
itinerant,
according to the
senator, living
at various times
in New York and
Los Angeles and
spending several
years in Las
Vegas. But it
appears that
most of their
time was spent
in the Miami
area, where a
1958 city
directory shows
a Mario Rubio
employed at the
luxurious Roney
Plaza Hotel. In one 2010
interview with
Fox News’s Sean
Hannity, Marco
Rubio seemed
uncertain about
the date of his
parents’
arrival, saying,
“My parents and
grandparents
came here from
Cuba in ’58,
’59.” None of
the public
statements
reviewed by The
Washington Post
gave 1956 as
their arrival
date. The senator’s
office tried to
clarify the
facts in its
statement
Thursday. After
coming to the
United States in
1956, Rubio’s
parents visited
Cuba after
Castro’s
takeover. In
1961, Oriales
Rubio took her
two children to
Cuba “with the
intention of
remaining
permanently.”
Mario remained
in Florida
“wrapping up the
family’s
matters.” But
within weeks of
arriving, “it
because clear
that Cuba was
headed full
speed toward
Communism and
they decided to
return to the
U.S,” the
statement said.
Rubio’s staff
allowed The Post
to examine
copies of his
parents’
passports. They
showed that
between the
couple’s
admission for
permanent U.S.
residence and
Castro’s victory
on Jan. 1, 1959,
his father spent
five days in
Cuba and his
mother spent no
more than two
months and three
days there. The
passports show
that Rubio’s
mother made at
least four short
trips to the
island after
Castro’s
victory,
including a
month-long stay
in February and
March 1961. Marco Rubio
was born 10
years later in
Miami. The next
year, his older
brother, Mario,
petitioned for
naturalization.
The document,
signed by their
father, says
Mario Rubio was
“lawfully
admitted to the
United States
for permanent
residence on May
27, 1956.” The
entry date
coincides with a
notarized
“Declaration of
Domicile” —
filed in Dade
County Circuit
Court by their
father in 1974 .
It states that
“I . . . am and
have been a bona
fide resident of
the state of
Florida since
the 27th day of
May, 1956.” On Sept. 9,
1975, Marco
Rubio’s parents
also petitioned
for
naturalization.
Their petitions
list the same
date of
admission to the
United States as
the petition of
Rubio’s brother.
It is unclear
why Rubio’s
parents waited
15 years to seek
naturalization.
The parents’
naturalization
papers have
begun to
circulate on the
Internet as part
of a “birther”
controversy
related to
Rubio’s
eligibility for
future
presidential
tickets. The
controversy,
which was
reported this
week in the St.
Petersburg
Times, has been
compared to the
frenzy
surrounding
President
Obama’s
birthplace, but
in reality it
bears a closer
resemblance to
the fight over
Sen. John
McCain’s
eligibility in
the 2008
election. Both
the McCain
squabble and the
low-simmer Rubio
case center on
the definition
of who is a
“natural-born
citizen.” In the
last
presidential
cycle, some
suggested that
McCain (R-Ariz.)
was ineligible
because he was
born in the
Panama Canal
Zone. A similar
claim has been
made in blogs
and other forums
because Rubio’s
parents were not
citizens when he
was born in
Florida in 1971.
But legal
scholars on both
sides of the
McCain debate
told The Post
that Rubio’s
citizenship does
not appear to be
an issue. Rubio emerged
as a national
political figure
in 2009 when he
took on Charlie
Crist, a
once-popular
Republican
Florida
governor, in a
heated Senate
race. Crist was
forced to run as
an independent
because of
Rubio’s surge. In a
television
interview on Fox
Business, Rubio
spelled out the
central message
of his campaign,
saying: “I
believe limited
government has
made America the
most prosperous
people in the
history of the
world.” Then he
pivoted to the
theme that had
served him so
well. “And I
think that the
direction we’re
going in
Washington,
D.C., would make
us more like the
rest of the
world, and not
like the
exceptional
nation my
parents found
when they came
here from Cuba
in 1959, and the
nation they
worked in so
hard so that I
could inherit.”
This account
is based on
reporting for a
biography of
Rubio that is
scheduled to be
published next
year by Simon &
Schuster.
Research editor
Alice Crites
contributed to
this report.










