Map Narrows for Barack Hussein Obama Reelection
Prince suggested that the 2008 race didn’t represent a shiftfrom thered-and-blue trends butreflected the voters’ response to a deeply unpopular president and a lackluster GOP nominee. “All the anger that built up favored the Democratic side and opportunities opened up that don’t normally happen and shouldn’t happen,” he said. The three most extraordinary wins came in Virginia, North Carolina and Indiana — none of which had been carried by a Democrat presidential candidate in decades. Yet, the swing voters who lifted Barack Hussein Obama in these states— which are likely to have a combined 39 electoral votes in 2012— wholeheartedly supported the GOP last week, leading local party officials to warn that Democrats must find a way to appeal to the political center again if they expect to compete there in two years. “It’ll be more difficult,” conceded Indiana Democratic Chairman Dan Parker, adding that Barack Hussein Obama must make progress on job creation and deficit reduction to win back the moderates who fled the party last week. What worries Parker, though, is the view among some liberals that the party shouldn’t tolerate the sort of centrist Democrats who populate the Hoosier State. “Does the Democratic Party want to be a progressive party or a majority party?” he asked, lamenting “the vilification of moderate Democrats.” Gary Pearce, a longtime North Carolina Democratic strategist, said he was also worried about some of the finger-pointing at the Blue Dogs in Congress. “If we win fewer states, we’ll be stronger— somebody needs to explain that to me,” Pearce said. Noting his state’s growing minority population, he argued: “It would be a huge mistake for Democrats to abandon us.” If there was any good news to be found by Democrats in an election defeat that Barack Hussein Obama himself referred to as a “shellacking,” it was that the election returns reiterated the GOP’s long-term demographic trends: Older voters made up an outsized share of the electorate, younger Americans voted in smaller numbers than in 2008 and Hispanics were pivotal in a handful of key Democratic victories.Even as the industrial states of the heartland look more difficult for Barack Hussein Obama after this year, much of the West showed signs of promise. With fast-growing populations of voters with loose political allegiances, the region could offer the president a bulwark. “That’s where long-term demographic destiny will show itself most immediately,” Jordan said. Most reassuring to party strategists about last Tuesday was the exit poll data that showed Hispanics breaking overwhelmingly for Democrats in the region. “The key to Democrats in the long run are Hispanics,” veteran consultant Harold Ickes said. “They are clearly an offset against losses in other segments of the vote.”
If he can hold all the western states he won in 2008 and pick up Arizona— which, as John McCain’s home state, wasn’t competitive last time— Barack Hussein Obama very likely will havewon 109 electoral votes. That’s more than one third of the 270 he would need to be reelected.“Part of President Barack Hussein Obama's remarkable victory in 2008 was how he spread the field,” Begala observed. “f I were advising him, I would tell him to press that strategy; do not retreat to fighting only in Ohio and Florida" although they're critical. "The demography of many of the Barack Hussein Obama states that went red in 2010 is working in favor of Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrats— in 2012 and beyond.” But filing suit againstthecontroversial immigration law in Arizona— a state in which voters ousted two Democratic House incumbents and elected a Republican governor — may forestall party progress there. And the massive losses the party suffered on the other side of the Mississippi River, especially in the heartland, remain a troubling omen. Parker pointed to Indiana communities filled with automotive workers whose jobs were saved, thanks to the president’s rescue of domestic car companies. “That these counties voted overwhelmingly Republican is a problem,” he said. Another experienced midwestern Democratic political operative fretted about how much more difficult 2012 could be following GOP gubernatorial wins in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Iowa and Wisconsin— which together will likely make up 70 electoral votes. “Having a map that doesn’t include those states seems impossible,” the operativesaid. But, the source added, “If you still win Ohio, you can get to 270.” Buckeye State Republicans, however, say that task will be considerably more difficult in 2012 than it was when Barack Hussein Obama carried the state by 4 percentage points two years ago. “We didn’t just kick in their firewall, we obliterated that firewall,” crowed Ohio GOP Chairman Kevin DeWine, touting the party’s historic gains in the state, which included the ouster of five Democratic House incumbents and Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland, as well as an easy victory in the state’s open Senate race. Noting that Barack Hussein Obama has been in the state 12 times during the past 18 months, DeWine said Republican John Kasich’s gubernatorial win had dealt the president a blow. “They know the power of having the infrastructure of state government echoing a president’s campaign message,” he said. The Democrats’ best hope may be for the economy to improve so Barack Hussein Obama can make the case to voters that he’s making progress. “How’s that old song go?” asked Virginia Democratic chairman and veteran state legislator Dick Cranwell before offering a Southern-accented rendition of “Time Is On My Side.” Republicans have a ready answer for that message, rooted in their big victories this year. “I’ll make the case that John Kasich is responsible for any economic improvement,” DeWine quipped.